Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Christian Sigsgaard vs Michiel De Krom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sigsgaard vs Krom analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Christian Sigsgaard vs Michiel De Krom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sigsgaard 0 - 0 Krom
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sigsgaard has won 55.21% of points on their second serve, while Krom has won 49.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sigsgaard, in recent form, has won 59.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Krom has won 56.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.62% and 38.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sigsgaard has saved 58.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Krom has saved 54.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sigsgaard has won 52.63% of matches played (W/L 10/ 9), with Krom winning 64.37% (W/L 56/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sigsgaard has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 26/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Krom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 130/ 95), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Sigsgaard has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 10/ 9), where as Krom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.37% of matches (W/L 56/ 31). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sigsgaard has played against opponents with an average rank of 141.84 while Krom has played against players with an average rank of 181.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sigsgaard has won 17% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Krom has won 37% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sigsgaard has converted 59.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Krom has converted 48.6% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
876
Rank
753
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
735
Rank
689
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
63% (92-55)
Career Total W/L
58% (190-139)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
70% (37-16)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Christian Sigsgaard vs Michiel De Krom For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Sigsgaard VS Krom
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Christian Sigsgaard | Michiel De Krom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 70% (37/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 67% (82/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (51/40) | 58% (649/471) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 65% (13/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 73% (24/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 54 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:24 | 1:32:26 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 92.4 | 218.49 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (173/269) | 71% (2062/2885) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (115/173) | 63% (1295/2062) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (53/96) | 50% (408/823) |
| BPs Won% Total | 59% (16/27) | 49% (174/358) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (123/283) | 45% (1320/2913) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 70% (37/16) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 69% (36/52) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 43% (6/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 47% (7/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 87% (38/33) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 13% (38/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 27% (15/4) |
Christian Sigsgaard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Marc Majdandzic
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Sidane Pontjodikromo
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Jan Simonsson
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Siem Woldeab
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Derek Pham
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
83 of
119)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
47 of
83)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
119)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexey Zakharov
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
13
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Bogdan Bobrov
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Michiel De Krom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Michiel De Krom
65%
(
89 of
137)
1st Serve %
66%
(
85 of
128)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
57 of
85)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
54 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
50 of
128)
133
Total Points Won
132
|
7-6(4) 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Mika Lipp
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Twan Van Zijl
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
83%
(
43 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Stijn Paardekooper
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
99)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Ryan Nijboer
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
71%
(
74 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Miguel Damas
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Mario Mansilla Diez
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Michiel De Krom
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sigsgaard Vs Krom Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sigsgaard are available here and Krom photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
